Images in source code.

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
23 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Images in source code.

Julian Hyde-3
Can someone please log a JIRA case on RAT? As soon as this feature is in a released version of RAT I’ll change our release process to require headers in all images.

Julian

> On Jun 15, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Felix Meschberger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Here: http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ ?
>
> and http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/XMP.html
>
> (Thanks Google ;-) )
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> Am 15.06.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Martin Gainty <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>>:
>
> James and Team
>
>
> quick update I have factored rat-plugin to read XMP (an XML metadata-tagged file with embedded Image)
>
> i have tried adding metadata tags using the crippled freebie photoshop and could not find any way to add metadata tags to PNG, JPG or PSD as the File/FileInfo menu in freebie photoshop is hopelessly greyed out/disabled
>
> Im reading some blogs that exiftool<sp?> can add metadata tags to any existing image
>
> Any clues as to where to locate any tool that can add metadata tag to an Image would be appreciated
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Martin
> ______________________________________________
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Martin Gainty <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>>
> Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 8:49 AM
> To: [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: Images in source code.
>
>
> is there anyway to run maven-rat-plugin to make sure ASF licensed assets are *not* being subverted by salesforce
>
>
> http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html
>
>
> Apache Rat™ Plugin for Apache Maven – apache-rat:rat<http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html>
> creadur.apache.org<http://creadur.apache.org>
> apache-rat:rat. Note:This goal should be used as a Maven report. Full name: org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.13-SNAPSHOT:rat. Description:
>
> ?
>
> Martin
> ______________________________________________
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: John D. Ament <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 9:46 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: Images in source code.
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:20 PM Craig Russell <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> Everything that is not explicitly called out in the top level NOTICE and
> LICENSE files are licensed under the Apache 2.0 license.
>
> Adding a file to this directory might mislead people into thinking that
> they need to perform more due diligence with other files in other
> directories.
>
> My advice is to *not* add anything. Let the images be licensed per the
> terms the top level LICENSE file.
>
>
> Agreed.  What we do like to make sure is called out is if there is
> provenance that these images came from somewhere else.  If these images
> were not created by you and were not already under apache license, then we
> would have a concern.
>
>
>
> Craig
>
> On Jun 2, 2017, at 2:20 PM, James Bognar <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks!
>
> I haven't found a metadata editor that works yet, so I'll just add a
> LICENSE.txt file to the directory.  Hopefully that's enough.
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Josh Elser <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> On 6/2/17 1:15 PM, James Bognar wrote:
>
> I just added several png files to the source tree of our podling.  I
> created them myself.  Are there any best-practices on how to mark
> these as
> Apache licensed?
>
>
> I'm not sure of a good way to track this. I'm not sure if png supports
> arbitrary metadata which could be edited. Some ways I've seen used
> elsewhere to try to better propagate license/ownership:
>
> * Comments on the issue-tracker issue that introduced them citing
> origin/source (typically for images that are copied, not created)
> * Entry in LICENSE/NOTICE (shouldn't be done unnecessarily, of course)
> * A README in the same directory with relevant info
>
> If the images are of the podling's creation, I wouldn't be particularly
> worried. The copyright notice on your source-release and LICENSE are
> sufficient to inform downstream consumers.
>
> Probably not the answer you're looking for, but hope it helps :)
>
> - Josh
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
>
>
> --
> James Bognar
>
> Craig L Russell
> [hidden email]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Images in source code.

Martin Gainty
In reply to this post by Felix Meschberger-4


________________________________

From: Felix Meschberger <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 8:13 PM
To: [hidden email]
Cc: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Images in source code.

Here: http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ ?
ExifTool by Phil Harvey - Queen's University<http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/>
www.sno.phy.queensu.ca
The OS X package installs the ExifTool command-line application and libraries in /usr/local/bin. After installing, type "exiftool" in a Terminal window to run ...

MG>Thank god for Opensource technologies that work
MG>Vielen Danke Felix!


and http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/XMP.html
XMP Tags - Queen's University<http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/XMP.html>
www.sno.phy.queensu.ca
XMP Tags. XMP stands for "Extensible Metadata Platform", an XML/RDF-based metadata format which is being pushed by Adobe. Information in this format can be embedded ...




(Thanks Google ;-) )

Regards
Felix

Am 15.06.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Martin Gainty <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>>:

James and Team


quick update I have factored rat-plugin to read XMP (an XML metadata-tagged file with embedded Image)

i have tried adding metadata tags using the crippled freebie photoshop and could not find any way to add metadata tags to PNG, JPG or PSD as the File/FileInfo menu in freebie photoshop is hopelessly greyed out/disabled

Im reading some blogs that exiftool<sp?> can add metadata tags to any existing image

Any clues as to where to locate any tool that can add metadata tag to an Image would be appreciated


Thanks,

Martin
______________________________________________



________________________________
From: Martin Gainty <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>>
Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 8:49 AM
To: [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: Images in source code.


is there anyway to run maven-rat-plugin to make sure ASF licensed assets are *not* being subverted by salesforce


http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html
Apache Rat™ Plugin for Apache Maven – apache-rat:rat<http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html>
creadur.apache.org
apache-rat:rat. Note:This goal should be used as a Maven report. Full name: org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.13-SNAPSHOT:rat. Description:





Apache Rat™ Plugin for Apache Maven – apache-rat:rat<http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html>
Apache Rat™ Plugin for Apache Maven – apache-rat:rat<http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html>
creadur.apache.org
apache-rat:rat. Note:This goal should be used as a Maven report. Full name: org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.13-SNAPSHOT:rat. Description:



creadur.apache.org<http://creadur.apache.org>
[http://www.apache.org/images/asf_logo.gif]<http://creadur.apache.org/>

Apache Creadur - Apache Software Foundation<http://creadur.apache.org/>
creadur.apache.org
Welcome to Apache Creadur About Apache Creadur. This project started as just Rat, a release auditing tool good with licenses, coded in Java with plugins for Ant and Maven



apache-rat:rat. Note:This goal should be used as a Maven report. Full name: org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.13-SNAPSHOT:rat. Description:

?

Martin
______________________________________________



________________________________
From: John D. Ament <[hidden email]>
Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 9:46 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Images in source code.

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:20 PM Craig Russell <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi James,

Everything that is not explicitly called out in the top level NOTICE and
LICENSE files are licensed under the Apache 2.0 license.

Adding a file to this directory might mislead people into thinking that
they need to perform more due diligence with other files in other
directories.

My advice is to *not* add anything. Let the images be licensed per the
terms the top level LICENSE file.


Agreed.  What we do like to make sure is called out is if there is
provenance that these images came from somewhere else.  If these images
were not created by you and were not already under apache license, then we
would have a concern.



Craig

On Jun 2, 2017, at 2:20 PM, James Bognar <[hidden email]>
wrote:

Thanks!

I haven't found a metadata editor that works yet, so I'll just add a
LICENSE.txt file to the directory.  Hopefully that's enough.

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Josh Elser <[hidden email]> wrote:

On 6/2/17 1:15 PM, James Bognar wrote:

I just added several png files to the source tree of our podling.  I
created them myself.  Are there any best-practices on how to mark
these as
Apache licensed?


I'm not sure of a good way to track this. I'm not sure if png supports
arbitrary metadata which could be edited. Some ways I've seen used
elsewhere to try to better propagate license/ownership:

* Comments on the issue-tracker issue that introduced them citing
origin/source (typically for images that are copied, not created)
* Entry in LICENSE/NOTICE (shouldn't be done unnecessarily, of course)
* A README in the same directory with relevant info

If the images are of the podling's creation, I wouldn't be particularly
worried. The copyright notice on your source-release and LICENSE are
sufficient to inform downstream consumers.

Probably not the answer you're looking for, but hope it helps :)

- Josh

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]




--
James Bognar

Craig L Russell
[hidden email]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Images in source code.

Martin Gainty
In reply to this post by Julian Hyde-3


________________________________
From: Julian Hyde <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 8:19 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Images in source code.

Can someone please log a JIRA case on RAT? As soon as this feature is in a released version of RAT I’ll change our release process to require headers in all images.

Julian

MG>i have a rat patch but its untested so no claim to victory until i know it passes at least one testcase with embedded metadata for at least one MG>Image format
MG>mea culpa on no entry in RAT Jira ..i will do that right now
MG>Many Thanks to Julian,Felix and James

> On Jun 15, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Felix Meschberger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Here: http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ ?
ExifTool by Phil Harvey - Queen's University<http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/>
www.sno.phy.queensu.ca
The OS X package installs the ExifTool command-line application and libraries in /usr/local/bin. After installing, type "exiftool" in a Terminal window to run ...



>
> and http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/XMP.html
XMP Tags - Queen's University<http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/XMP.html>
www.sno.phy.queensu.ca
XMP Tags. XMP stands for "Extensible Metadata Platform", an XML/RDF-based metadata format which is being pushed by Adobe. Information in this format can be embedded ...



>
> (Thanks Google ;-) )
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> Am 15.06.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Martin Gainty <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>>:
>
> James and Team
>
>
> quick update I have factored rat-plugin to read XMP (an XML metadata-tagged file with embedded Image)
>
> i have tried adding metadata tags using the crippled freebie photoshop and could not find any way to add metadata tags to PNG, JPG or PSD as the File/FileInfo menu in freebie photoshop is hopelessly greyed out/disabled
>
> Im reading some blogs that exiftool<sp?> can add metadata tags to any existing image
>
> Any clues as to where to locate any tool that can add metadata tag to an Image would be appreciated
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Martin
> ______________________________________________
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Martin Gainty <[hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>>
> Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 8:49 AM
> To: [hidden email]<mailto:[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: Images in source code.
>
>
> is there anyway to run maven-rat-plugin to make sure ASF licensed assets are *not* being subverted by salesforce
>
>
> http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html
Apache Rat™ Plugin for Apache Maven – apache-rat:rat<http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html>
creadur.apache.org
apache-rat:rat. Note:This goal should be used as a Maven report. Full name: org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.13-SNAPSHOT:rat. Description:



>
>
> Apache Rat™ Plugin for Apache Maven – apache-rat:rat<http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html>
Apache Rat™ Plugin for Apache Maven – apache-rat:rat<http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html>
creadur.apache.org
apache-rat:rat. Note:This goal should be used as a Maven report. Full name: org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.13-SNAPSHOT:rat. Description:



> creadur.apache.org<http://creadur.apache.org>
[http://www.apache.org/images/asf_logo.gif]<http://creadur.apache.org/>

Apache Creadur - Apache Software Foundation<http://creadur.apache.org/>
creadur.apache.org
Welcome to Apache Creadur About Apache Creadur. This project started as just Rat, a release auditing tool good with licenses, coded in Java with plugins for Ant and Maven



> apache-rat:rat. Note:This goal should be used as a Maven report. Full name: org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.13-SNAPSHOT:rat. Description:
>
> ?
>
> Martin
> ______________________________________________
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: John D. Ament <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 9:46 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: Images in source code.
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:20 PM Craig Russell <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> Everything that is not explicitly called out in the top level NOTICE and
> LICENSE files are licensed under the Apache 2.0 license.
>
> Adding a file to this directory might mislead people into thinking that
> they need to perform more due diligence with other files in other
> directories.
>
> My advice is to *not* add anything. Let the images be licensed per the
> terms the top level LICENSE file.
>
>
> Agreed.  What we do like to make sure is called out is if there is
> provenance that these images came from somewhere else.  If these images
> were not created by you and were not already under apache license, then we
> would have a concern.
>
>
>
> Craig
>
> On Jun 2, 2017, at 2:20 PM, James Bognar <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks!
>
> I haven't found a metadata editor that works yet, so I'll just add a
> LICENSE.txt file to the directory.  Hopefully that's enough.
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Josh Elser <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> On 6/2/17 1:15 PM, James Bognar wrote:
>
> I just added several png files to the source tree of our podling.  I
> created them myself.  Are there any best-practices on how to mark
> these as
> Apache licensed?
>
>
> I'm not sure of a good way to track this. I'm not sure if png supports
> arbitrary metadata which could be edited. Some ways I've seen used
> elsewhere to try to better propagate license/ownership:
>
> * Comments on the issue-tracker issue that introduced them citing
> origin/source (typically for images that are copied, not created)
> * Entry in LICENSE/NOTICE (shouldn't be done unnecessarily, of course)
> * A README in the same directory with relevant info
>
> If the images are of the podling's creation, I wouldn't be particularly
> worried. The copyright notice on your source-release and LICENSE are
> sufficient to inform downstream consumers.
>
> Probably not the answer you're looking for, but hope it helps :)
>
> - Josh
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
>
>
> --
> James Bognar
>
> Craig L Russell
> [hidden email]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

12